To do either is contrary to the principle of using all relevant evidence for decision making. Chapter 11 network metaanalysis doing metaanalysis in r. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking statistics in practice. However, there are some worthwhile issues that need to be explored. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network. Selection from network metaanalysis for decisionmaking book. First, it is commonly agreed that metaanalysis, including network metaanalysis, should assess. Full ebook network metaanalysis for decisionmaking. A comprehensive, coherent framework for network meta analysis mixed treatment comparisons is adopted and estimated using bayesian markov chain monte carlo methods implemented in the freely available software winbugs. Network metaanalysis compares multiple interventions simultaneously by. When making treatment decisions, it is often necessary to consider the relative efficacy and safety of multiple potential interventions. Efficacy and safety of biologics in psoriatic arthritis. First use of network metaanalysis nma for a complex network. From pairwise meta analysis to network meta analysis decision making is more complex than a pairwise meta analysis since it moves from a twodimensional to a multidimensional analytical framework.
In the following, we will describe how to perform a network meta analysis based on a bayesian hierarchical framework. Objective to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of approved bdmards in patients with. Centre for the study of african economies 275 views. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking statistics in practice dias, sofia, ades, a. Conducting indirecttreatmentcomparison and networkmeta. Download product flyer is to download pdf in new tab. Network metaanalysis for decision making will be of interest to decision makers, medical statisticians, health economists, and anyone involved in health technology. Network metaanalysis, a new statistical technique at urologists. Network meta analysis is a technique for comparing multiple treatments simultaneously in a single analysis by combining direct and indirect evidence within a network of randomized controlled trials. In such situations, network meta analysis nma can inform evidencebased decision making. Network metaanalysis for decision making request pdf. An introduction to network metaanalysis mixed treatment.
Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta. Network metaanalysis for decision making will be of interest to decision makers, medical statisticians, health economists, and anyone involved in health technology assessment including the pharmaceutical industry. The result was very useful in the decisionmaking process, especially for pain relief in treating patients with as. School of social and community medicine using network metaanalysis nma for decision making 1 sofia dias with thanks to. Network metaanalysis to synthesize evidence for decision. A practical guide to network meta analysis with examples and code. Who use of network metaanalysis in clinical guidelines. Network metaanalysis to synthesize evidence for decision making in cardiovascular research. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking pdf libribook. This is a great addition to this field, which has lacked a comprehensive introductory book intended for beginners. In this book, the authors present pragmatic and useful summaries of the necessary steps for conducting diagnostic accuracy metaanalysis. Background biologic diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs bdmards and targeted synthetic dmards are used in patients with psoriatic arthritis psa, but few studies directly compare their clinical efficacy.
Visualizingassumptionsandresultsinnetwork metaanalysis. Jan 12, 2018 network meta analysis for decision making will be of interest to decision makers, medical statisticians, health economists, and anyone involved in health technology assessment including the pharmaceutical industry. It outlines alternative methods of statistical estimation that are suitable for embedding network meta. Cappelleri, phd, mph pfizer inc invited oral presentation at the 12th annual scientific meeting of the international society for cns clinical trials and methodology, 1618.
Decision making requires that before acting on evidence, a determination rating of confidence in this evidence is to be made. The confidence in estimates quality of evidence from network meta analysis. In the evaluation of healthcare, rigorous methods of. Given the great value of itc and network metaanalysis for healthcare decision making and its increasing acceptance e. Thus, we aim to provide a basic explanation of network metaanalysis. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking will be of interest to decision makers, medical statisticians, health economists, and anyone involved in health technology assessment including the pharmaceutical industry. A gentle introduction to metaanalysis with reference to stata and r, csae metaanalysis workshop duration. Network metaanalysis nma, also termed multiple treatment metaanalysis or mixed treatment comparisons, was developed as an extension of pairwise metaanalysis to allow comparisons of more than two interventions in a single, coherent analysis of all the relevant rcts. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking medical books free. Wiley network metaanalysis for decisionmaking 9781118647509.
Due to the lack of direct evidence, tools as network metaanalysis and indirect. Several methods are being developed, such as adjusted indirect comparison, multitreatment meta analysis, multiarm meta analysis. Often when performing a meta analysis on the effectiveness of certain interventions, we are less interested in the question if one particular intervention is effective e. Network metaanalysis provides a method of assessing relative efficacy among many treatments by use of direct studies which compare given treatments and. Depends on many factors such as but not limited to. The chapter proposes two separate sections of code and data in the same winbugs run, one for the network meta. However, the who have recently begun using network metaanalyses to inform clinical guidelines,4 the global scientific production of network metaanalyses is increasing rapidly5 and some argue that the methodology should represent the highest level of evidence for instructing clinical decisionmaking.
Diagnostic metaanalysis a useful tool for clinical. Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials is widely used in the medical research literature, 1 3 and methodology for pairwise metaanalysis is well developed. A practical guide to network metaanalysis with examples and code in the evaluation of healthcare, rigorous methods of quantitative assessment are necessary. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking by sofia dias. Request pdf on feb, 2018, sofia dias and others published network metaanalysis for decision making find, read and cite all the research you need on researchgate. Sutton, 9781118647509, john wiley report browse more videos. Jul 30, 2019 network meta analysis for decision making by sofia dias, a. In this article, we provide a suite of commands with graphical tools.
However, the who have recently begun using network meta analyses to inform clinical guidelines, 4 the global scientific production of network meta analyses is increasing rapidly 5 and some argue that the methodology should represent the highest level of evidence for instructing clinical decision making. In order to draw valid conclusions about the relative efficacy and safety of treatments in a network metaanalysis and facilitate good decision making, it is important to understand and evaluate these assumptions. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking on apple books. Indirect treatment comparisonnetwork metaanalysis study. Despite the great realized and potential value of network metaanalysis to inform health care decision making and its increasing acceptance e. In practice, all of these methods involve meta analysis in the context of a network of evidence. A practical guide to network metaanalysis with examples and code in the evaluation of healthcare, rigorous methods of quantitative assessment are necessary to establish which interventions are effective and costeffective. This is a very frequent case, given that there are no enough studies making. May 27, 2019 network meta analysis for decision making by sofia dias, a. Nicky welton, tony ades, debbi caldwell, alex sutton iscb, august 20, munich. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking statistics in. Network metaanalysis to synthesize evidence for decision making. A practical guide to network metaanalysis with examples and code.
Heterogeneity, consistency and model fit should be assessed. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network mtaanalysis. Network meta analysis may assist assessing the comparative effectiveness of different treatments regularly used in clinical practice and, therefore, has become attractive among clinicians. This article aims to summarize the key features of network meta analysis and its potential impact on cardiovascular decision making. School of population and public health, university of british columbia, vancouver, canada. Itc, mixed treatment comparison, network meta analysis, heterogeneity, similarity, and consistency. Network meta analysis for decision making will be of interest to decision makers, medical statisticians, health economists, and anyone involved in health technology assessment including the pharmaceutical industry. Network metaanalysis is about estimating relative treatment effects between competing interventions. This simple tutorial is not meant to be a comprehensive introduction to r or even the network package in r.
Network meta analysis for decision making takes an approach to evidence synthesis that is specifically intended for decision making when there are two or more treatment alternatives being evaluated, and assumes that the purpose of every synthesis is to answer the question for this preidentified population of patients, which treatment is best. Each chapter contains worked examples, exercises, solutions and code that may be adapted by readers to apply to their own analyses. In this second post, well look at the key assumptions of network metaanalysis. In the evaluation of healthcare, rigorous methods of quantitative assessment are necessary to establish which interventions are effective and costeffective. Bayesian, decision making, comparative effectiveness, indi rect treatment comparison, mixed treatment comparison, network metaanalysis.
Unlike traditional pairwise meta analysis, which allows for a comparison between two interventions by pooling headtohead data, network meta analysis nma allows for the simultaneous comparison of more than two interventions and for comparisons to be made. Mar 15, 2017 the recent development and introduction of a new technique usually referred as network metaanalysis, indirect metaanalysis, multiple or mixed treatment comparisons has allowed the estimation of metrics for all possible comparisons in the same model, simultaneously gathering direct and indirect evidence. Salanti g, del giovane c, chaimani a, caldwell dm, higgins jpt. The r package we will use to do this is the gemtc package valkenhoef et al.
958 105 1535 377 1187 637 796 1216 194 1023 370 1275 1269 664 1494 602 1141 1234 1278 1354 430 1393 1510 650 1443 1411 270 1145 113 174 863 230 789 639 630 578